Newsletters & Publications
| Volume
16 - Number 1 |
Spring 1999 |
COMMON ABBREVIATIONS
BMI: body mass index (kg/m2)
CAD: coronary artery disease
CHD: coronary heart disease
CHO: carbohydrate
CI: confidence interval
CVD: cardiovascular disease
ene: energy
HDL: high density lipoprotein
LDL: low density lipoprotein
Lp(a): lipoprotein (a)
MI: myocardial infarction
MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids
NCEP: National Cholesterol Education Program
P:S: dietary polyunsaturated:saturated fat ratio
PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids
RR: relative risk
SFA: saturated fatty acids
TAG: triacylglycerol
VLDL: very low density lipoprotein
Wide variations in plasma cholesterol concentrations
of individuals following an identical diet strongly suggest genetic
components regulating dietary effects on lipid metabolism. This
heterogeneity in individual responses to dietary factors has been
shown to be in part attributed to the apolipoprotein E phenotype.
Previous studies have suggested that individuals with apo E 4/4
alleles were the most sensitive to diet mediated changes in plasma
lipid levels.
In a prospective study, Sarkkinen et al. investigated
the effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on serum lipid responses
to a modified NCEP diet and a NCEP diet high in cholesterol. Forty-five
volunteers with known apo E genotypes were included in the study.
One-third had an apo E phenotype of E 4/4 and the remaining 2/3
were equally divided between phenotypes E 3/4 and E 3/3. All subjects
were matched for age, gender, BMI, and menopausal status. Other
study criteria were that subjects be between 30-65 years, hypercholesterolemic
with cholesterol levels between 193-328 mg/dl, and free of serious
illnesses associated with abnormal lipid levels.
Study cohorts followed 3 prescribed isocaloric
Finnish diets in a designated order. During the first 4 weeks,
subjects ate a baseline diet that consisted of 43% CHO, 16% protein,
38% total fat, 18% SFA, 13% MUFA, 5% PUFA, and 300 mg of cholesterol/d,
followed by 8 weeks of a modified NCEP diet which provided 48%
CHO, 17% protein, 34% total fat, 9% SFA, 14% MUFA, 8% PUFA, and
265 mg cholesterol/d, and the last 4 weeks subjects consumed a
high cholesterol NCEP diet with dietary cholesterol of 566 mg/d.
Dietary cholesterol was increased by either adding egg yolks or
cholesterol-enriched cookies. The purpose of the baseline diet
was to minimize the carry over effects from the subjects normal
diets. Compliance on each diet was closely monitored with regular
collection of food records and analysis of fatty acid composition
of serum cholesterol levels. These analyses indicated that subjects
were adhering to the prescribed diets.
Blood samples were collected and assayed on
weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16. Plasma lipids responded differently
to dietary modification depending on apo E phenotype. The subjects
with apo E 4/4 were the most sensitive to dietary changes. During
the NCEP diet, the apo E 4/4 group decreased their plasma total
cholesterol by 39 mg/dl compared with 24 mg/dl for apo E 3/4 group
and 12 mg/dl for apo E 3/3 group. These values represent decreases
in plasma cholesterol of 14%, 9%, and 4% for apo E 4/4, apo E 3/4,
and apo E 3/3 groups, respectively. The LDL cholesterol levels
also decreased by 28 mg/dl, 18 mg/dl, and 8 mg/dl in apo E 4/4,
apo E 3/4, and E 3/3 group, respectively. The plasma total and
LDL cholesterol levels steadily decreased in apo E 4/4 subjects
throughout the NCEP diet, however, in apo E 3/4 subjects, after
an initial drop, it leveled off. Surprisingly, it increased in
apo E 3/3 subjects in the last 6 weeks. The plasma HDL cholesterol
decreased in apo E 4/4 and apo E 3/4 subjects by 3.8 mg/dl and
4.3 mg/dl, respectively. The change in HDL cholesterol levels in
apo E 3/3 subjects was not significant.
During the high cholesterol (+300 mg/dl) diet
phase, plasma total cholesterol levels increased by 22 mg/dl and
LDL cholesterol increased by 15 mg/dl in the apo E 4/4 group, twice
as much as the apo E 3/4 and apo E 3/3 subjects. The percent change
in total cholesterol was also 2 fold in this group. The HDL cholesterol
increases of 4.6% and 4.5% in apo E groups 4/4 and 3/4 were not
significant. The HDL cholesterol level was stable in the apo E
3/3 group during the high cholesterol diet phase.There was no significant
difference among the genotype groups with TAG and blood pressure
levels. However, even though plasma total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol,
HDL cholesterol, and TAG levels increased the most in subjects
with apo E 4/4, these plasma lipoprotein levels were still less
than the baseline values.
The results from this study clearly show a
relationship between apo E polymorphism and lipid response to fat
and cholesterol modified diets in moderately hypercholesterolemic,
middle-aged subjects. Compared to subjects with the apo E 3/3 genotype,
subjects with apo E 4/4 alleles were more sensitive to an increase
in dietary fat and cholesterol. Apo E 3/4 was associated with moderate
lipid responses to an increase in dietary fat and cholesterol.
The mechanisms by which apo E polymorphism regulates lipid metabolism
which makes apo E 4/4 subjects hyper-respond to increased fat and
cholesterol is unclear, but researchers speculate "that LDL
receptor regulation could explain the differences in LDL-cholesterol
concentrations among the apo E genotypes." For example, apo
E 4/4 subjects might be more efficient in absorbing dietary cholesterol
or delivering chylomicron and nonchylomicron fraction to the liver
thus down-regulating LDL receptors and increasing plasma LDL cholesterol
levels.
Sarrkinen and colleagues concluded that dietary
modification be implemented as a treatment in reducing CHD risk
in all people, not just people with apo E 4/4 allele who are very
sensitive to fat and cholesterol in the diet. It is estimated that
30% of Finnish and 15-25% of Western populations have apo E 4/4
genotype, which places them at a higher risk for CHD.
Changes in plasma total
cholesterol with added cholesterol
| Phenotype |
Plasma Cholesterol Change
(mg/dl per 100 mg/day cholesterol) |
| apo E 3/3 |
1.7 |
| apo E 3/4 |
2.3 |
| apo E 4/4 |
7.3 |
Key Messages
- Apolipoprotein E genotype modified the lipid response to dietary
fat and cholesterol.
- Subjects with apo E 4/4 genotype were the most sensitive to
dietary changes.
- Apo E 3/4 genotype increase total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol
more than apo E3/3.
Sarkkinen E, Korhonen M, Erkkila A, et al.
Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on serum lipid response
to the separate modification of dietary fat and dietary cholesterol. Am
J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:1215-1222.
Table of Contents
The benefits of physical activity on protecting
one from major diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease,
and cancer are common knowledge among people; however, only a fifth
of the population is regularly exercising. This percentage remains
unchanged in the past 14 years. The excuses people frequently site
for not exercising are lack of time, lack of access to a gym, and
lack of energy. But according to Dunn et al. moderate increases
in regular physical activity level throughout the day can be as
effective as a structured exercise program in improving long-term
cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in sedentary adults.
In this study, 235 adults were randomly enrolled
in a structured exercise program (n=114) and a lifestyle change
program (n=121) for 2 years with a dropout rate of 18% and 20%,
respectively. During the 6-month intervention period, the structured
exercise group was prescribed an exercise regiment that required
them to workout in a state of the art fitness center for 5 days
a week. The duration of exercise was between 20-60 minutes at a
target heart rate of 50-85%. Based on an individuals motivational
readiness, each participant in the lifestyle group was taught an
individual physical activity that they could incorporate into their
daily life for 30 minutes. Researchers used the Social Cognitive
Theory model to evaluate each individuals motivational readiness.
In addition, regular small group meetings provided extra support
to encourage compliance, and both groups were provided with monthly
activity calendars and quarterly newsletters for ongoing support.
Subjects in the 2 different intervention groups
were similar in age, gender, physical and health attributes. Following
the intervention period, both groups gained similar improvements
in physical activity, blood pressure, % body fat, and the total
cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio. However, participants in
the structured exercise group had better cardiorespiratory fitness
levels than the lifestyle group. For example, the VO2 peak
increased by 3.64 ml/kg-min compared to 1.58 ml/kg-min in the lifestyle
group. But during the 1-1/2 year maintenance phase, participants
in the structured group and lifestyle group decreased their VO2 peak
by 2.4 ml/kg-min and 0.7 ml/kg-min, respectively, resulting in
a comparable end VO2 peak levels.
The comparison of physical activity levels
between baseline and end of study revealed that although participants
in the structured exercise group were 3 times more likely to vigorously
exercise than the lifestyle group, they expended less total energy
(0.69 kcal/kg-day), lost less body fat (1.85%), and gained 1.5
pounds compared to the lifestyle group with energy expenditure
of 0.84 kcal/kg-day, weight and body fat losses of 0.11 pounds
and 2.39%, respectively. One possible explanation for this outcome
is that three times as many participants in the lifestyle group
were involved in a moderate activity than in the structured exercise
group during the maintenance phase. Regardless of study group,
subjects who continued to exercise regularly during the maintenance
period expended the most energy, 1.29 kcal/kg-day and lost 3 pounds
of body weight. Men in the study improved their physical fitness
and activity levels more than women.
Lipid and lipoprotein parameters were relatively
stable in the lifestyle group throughout the study, but it improved
significantly in the structured exercise participants during the
active intervention phase. However, no overall improvement was
noted during follow-up, but rather the total cholesterol to HDL
cholesterol ratio increased more in the structured exercise group
(0.20) than in the lifestyle group (0.06) during the study. The
changes in lipid and lipoprotein parameters between the study groups
during the 2 year study were not significant. Blood pressure levels,
especially diastolic levels, improved in both groups during the
maintenance period. Diastolic blood pressure decreased by 3.16
mm Hg and 2.66 mm Hg in life-style and structured exercise groups,
respectively.
These findings reiterate the outcome noted
in the fable about a race between a rabbit and a turtle. As in
the story, those who exercised diligently regardless of the intensity
were able to achieve the long term health benefits. Dunn et al.
were able to show that moderate lifestyle changes can be effective
in controlling ones weight, percent body fat, blood pressure,
and expending more energy than a structured exercise program if
the changes are followed continuously. Fitness does not have to
cost a lot of money to achieve great results, but rather cost-free
activities such as walking, gardening, climbing stairs are as effective
as state of the art facilities in promoting fitness. Lastly, this
study also demonstrated that it is possible to teach sedentary
people to increase their physical activity and cardiorespiratory
fitness on a long-term basis.
Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al. Comparison
of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical
activity and cardiorespiratory fitness, a random trial. JAMA.
1999;281:327-334.
Table of Contents
Studies indicate that a 1% increase in plasma
HDL cholesterol can result in a 3-4% decrease in CHD risk. Studies
also indicate that a major factor in premature CHD is a low HDL
cholesterol level. But how can HDL levels be increased? In this
study by Benoit et al. the effects of adenovirus apo A-I gene therapy
on plasma HDL levels and atherosclerosis progression in mice were
tested. The study protocol involved administering the human apo
A-I gene into 3 different types of mice; normal mice, human apo-A-I
transgenic mice, and apo E deficient mice expressing human apo
A-I, using a recombinant adenovirus (AV) to determine effects on
HDL cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis progression. The purpose
of using human apo A-I transgenic mice was to eliminate effects
of immune reaction against the human protein. The apo E deficient
transgenic mice were to test the effects of gene therapy on mice
prone to develop atherosclerosis.
The adenovirus-mediated human apo A-I gene
transfer in normal mice resulted in a significant increase in plasma
levels of human apo A-I and HDL cholesterol. The peak of human
apo A-I (130 mg/dl) and HDL cholesterol (95 mg/dl) occurred on
the 11th day and represented a 40% increase in HDL cholesterol
levels. In the human apo A-I transgenic mice, the plasma levels
of human apo A-I and HDL cholesterol increased to a greater degree
following AV apo A-I administration than in the normal mice. This
difference indicates that immune reaction does play a role in apo
A-I expression in normal mice following apo A-I injection compared
to those who express the gene during development. For example,
human apo A-I increased by 300% (143 mg/dl to 425 mg/dl) and HDL
cholesterol level by 36% (97 to 346 mg/dl) on the 7th day after
injection. Human apo A-I and HDL cholesterol levels remained high
for more than 6 weeks in AV apo A-I treated transgenic mice but
the levels in control mice remained unchanged throughout the study.
Also, the plasma TAG levels did not change following adenovirus
infection in transgenic mice.
In adenovirus mediated human apo A-I mice
with apo E deficiency, injection with AV apo A-I resulted in a
dramatic increase in plasma levels of human apo A-I from a baseline
of 112 mg/dl to 237 mg/dl on the 14th day and a decrease to 140
mg/dl on the 42nd day. The HDL cholesterol level increased by 190%.
However, there was little change in HDL cholesterol levels and
human apo A-I concentrations in control mice and in the apo E-knock
out/human apo A-I gene mice. Conversely, in the apo E-knock out/human
apo A-I gene mice, the mean lesion areas were much higher than
AV apo a-I treated mice. The percent of lesion in AV apo A-I mice
was 56.4% of control.
Results from this study showed an increase
in HDL cholesterol levels following the AV apo A-I transfer in
all 3 types of mice. This ultimately resulted in a reduction of
atherosclerosis development in apo E deficient transgenic mice.
The authors noted that "overexpression of apo A-I to higher-than-normal
concentrations can be considered as potential therapy to increase
HDL concentration and induce inhibition or regression of atherosclerotic
lesions in a large population."
Benoit P, Emmanuel F, Caillaud JM, et al.
Somatic gene transfer of human apo A-I inhibits atherosclerosis
progression in mouse models. Circulation. 1999;99:105-110.
Table of Contents
Health providers sometimes label their CVD
patients "noncompliant" when their blood cholesterol
levels do not change following prescription of a low-cholesterol
diet, but according to Sehayek and colleagues, this might be an
incorrect assessment. They found a wide inter-individual variation
in dietary cholesterol absorption which could in part explain the
seemingly erratic changes in the blood cholesterol levels after
a dietary modification.
In this randomized crossover trial, 18 healthy
subjects between the ages of 19 to 60 yrs (mean 30.3 yrs) were
fed 3 isocaloric, metabolic ward diets. The low-fat low-cholesterol
(LFLC) diet consisted of 60% CHO, 15% protein, 25% fat, and 80
mg cholesterol per 1000 kcal. The high-fat low-cholesterol (HFLC)
diet consisted of 42% CHO, 15% protein, 43% fat and 80 mg cholesterol
per 1000 kcal. And the last diet, a high-fat high-cholesterol (HFHC)
diet had the same nutrient composition as HFLC with an increase
in cholesterol to 200 mg per 1000 kcal. Each test diet was consumed
for 3 weeks without a washout period. Subjects plasma lipids,
lipoproteins, apolipoprotein E genotype, and cholesterol absorption
were measured during the last week of each diet.
The percent cholesterol absorption was similar
with the 3 test diets. The mean cholesterol absorption rate with
LFLC, HFLC, and HFHC were 60%, 58%, and 56%, respectively. However,
the individual absorption rates within each diet varied widely.
For example, during the LFLC diet, one test subject absorbed 36%
while another person absorbed 74%, with the others in between.
Similar outcomes were noted during HFLC and HFHC diets. The increase
in dietary cholesterol intake resulted in decreased absorption
rates in some, while it increased or remained the same in others.
The individual LDL cholesterol levels responded in similar fashion
on the high cholesterol diet. But as a collective group, their
total cholesterol levels increased by 11.7%, LDL cholesterol by
11.6% and HDL by 1.2% on a high cholesterol diet. The total cholesterol,
LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol levels increased by 12.9%,
6.8%, and 5.2% on the high fat diet.
Analysis of dietary cholesterol-induced changes
in % cholesterol absorption and % change in LDL cholesterol yielded
a U-shaped parabolic relationship. For example, as the % cholesterol
absorption deviated in either direction from a normal absorption
rate, the % LDL cholesterol increased. A similar relationship was
noted between HDL cholesterol and % dietary cholesterol absorption,
but not as much as LDL.
Dietary cholesterol and fat also affected
the mass absorption of dietary cholesterol. The average cholesterol
absorbed with the HFLC and HFHC diets were 1.7 mg/kg-day and 4.6
mg/kg-day, respectively. The increase in absorbed dietary cholesterol
switching from the HFLC to HFHC diet resulted in an extra 1 to
4.7 mg of dietary cholesterol absorbed per kg body weight per day.
On the high fat diet, only 3 of the 18 subjects increased the mass
absorption of dietary cholesterol and the remaining 15 decreased,
suggesting an unknown independent effect.
Large variability in individual levels of
LDL cholesterol, % cholesterol absorption, and dietary cholesterol
mass absorption among the study subjects following a metabolic
diet suggest that genetics plays an important role in an individuals
responsiveness to a high cholesterol or a high fat diet. Also,
according to this study, dietary fat and dietary cholesterol independently
affect dietary cholesterol mass absorption.
Sehayek E, Nath C, Heinemann T, et al. U-shape
relationship between change in dietary cholesterol absorption and
plasma lipoprotein responsiveness and evidence for extreme interindividual
variation in dietary cholesterol absorption in humans. J Lipid
Res. 1998;39:2415-2422.
Table of Contents
Due to its pro-oxidative effects, excessive
iron in the body has been postulated to increase CHD risk. However,
epidemiological evidence does not conclusively support such a hypothesis.
According to a meta-analysis by Danesh and Appleby, there is no
evidence supporting an association between iron status and CHD.
Based on 12 prospective studies with 7,800 cases, the investigators
found that those subjects with baseline serum ferritin levels of > 200
mg/l had similar risk of CHD as people with baseline serum ferritin
levels of < 200 mg/l. Other markers of iron status; transferrin
saturation, total iron-binding capacity, serum iron concentration,
and total dietary iron intake, showed similar results. The risk
ratio for CHD in subjects in the top third of transferrin saturation,
total iron-binding capacity, serum iron concentration, and total
dietary iron intake levels were 0.92, 0.98, 0.83, and 0.84 compared
to people in the bottom third of each markers.
This analysis found "no good evidence
for the existence of strong epidemiological associations between
iron status and CHD," but does encourage future investigators
to measure iron status periodically rather than only at baseline
as it can fluctuate with changes in medical condition or lifestyle.
Danesh J, Appleby P. Coronary heart disease
and iron status meta-analyses of prospective studies. Circulation.
1999;99:852-854.
Table of Contents
According to the Lifestyle Heart Trial, intensive
lifestyle changes can reduce CHD risk. In this randomized case-control
study, 35 subjects (20 cases,15 controls) completed a 5-yr study
of the effects of comprehensive lifestyle changes on coronary athero-sclerosis
progress. Initially, this was a 1 year trial extended 4 more years
following a positive outcome and excellent compliance rate. However,
compliance rates decreased during the last 4 yrs.
An intervention group was prescribed an intensive
lifestyle changing program that included a 10% fat, vegetarian
diet, aerobic exercise, stress management, smoking cessation and
group psychosocial support components. The control group followed
an NCEP Step 2 diet with moderate exercise. The experimental diets
were of 8.5% fat, 15% protein, 76.5% CHO, 19 mg of cholesterol
per day in the intervention group and in controls 25% fat, 18%
protein, 52% CHO, and 139 mg/day cholesterol.
Based on angiograms, the experimental group
exhibited a regression in coronary atherosclerosis, while the control
group coronary lesions continued to progress. For example, the
average percent diameter stenosis decreased by 1.75% in the 1st
yr and 3.1% in the 5th yr in case subjects, but increased by 2.3%
and 11.8% in the 1st and 5th yr in the control group. The relationship
between stenosis and lifestyle change in controls was not directly
observable due to introduction of lipid lowering medication in
9 subjects. This confounder explains the 19% decrease in plasma
LDL levels in controls. During the 5-yr follow-up, 3 control subjects
underwent revascularization thus significantly reducing the frequency
of reported angina in controls. The frequency of angina was reduced
by 91% and 72% in case subjects between the 1st and 5th yr. Also,
plasma HDL levels decreased and TAG levels increased on the intervention
diet, but the LDL:HDL ratio improved.
The rate of cardiac events was higher in the
control group than the intervention group, 45 vs. 25. Cardiac events
data were based on 20 control and 28 case subjects and included
subjects who dropped out.
Ornish et al. were able to demonstrate that
highly motivated subjects, following a strict lifestyle change,
were able to decrease their plasma levels of LDL cholesterol, cardiac
events, frequency of angina, and stenosis of coronary arteries.
The improvements in CHD symptoms were dose-dependent on adherence
to the intervention treatment.
There were several limitations to the current
study. The subjects were a highly motivated self-selected group
and do not represent the general population. The restricted intervention
of an 8% fat, vegetarian diet is not easily achievable or maintainable
by the general population. The change in coronary stenosis was
statistically significant, yet the changes were very small. Lastly,
throughout the study, data were analyzed based on 20 case subjects
and 15 controls, however, the cardiac events were based on 28 case
subjects and 20 controls, thus favoring cardiac events on behalf
of the controls.
Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH, et al.
Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA.
1998;280:2001-2007.
Table of Contents
The beneficial effect of moderate alcohol
consumption on heart disease has been well established, but its
relationship with stroke is disputed. One explanation for the mixed
results is that older studies did not distinguish between hemorrhagic
and ischemic strokes. A prospective, case-control study by Sacco
et al. suggests that 2 alcoholic drinks per day can reduce ischemic
stroke risk in the elderly.
Study groups consisted of 677 cases with fatal
or nonfatal ischemic stroke and 1139 age, sex, and race/ethnicity
matched controls. The average age was 70 years old. Sixty-seven
percent of cases and 53% of controls reported no alcohol consumption
in the past year while 24% and 41% of cases and controls, respectively,
drank less than 2 drinks per week. The case subjects had higher
rates of hypertension, cardiac disease, and diabetes, but were
less obese than the control group.
The odds ratio for ischemic stokes for moderate
alcohol consumption (>0 in past year to <2/d) was 0.42, and
for intermediate (>2/d to <5/d) and heavy (>5/d) alcohol
consumption were 0.58 and 1.38, respectively. Seven drinks per
day were associate with an odds ratio of 2.96. The relationships
between alcohol intake and ischemic strokes fit a J shaped curve
with the lowest risk at 2 drinks per day.
The types of alcoholic beverages made no difference
in the relationship between alcohol and stroke. Also, this study
found no difference in the relationship between moderate alcohol
intake and stroke in male vs. female subjects, people less than
65 vs. greater than 65 years of age, or people of different ethnic
origin. Researchers noted that the protective effects of moderate
alcohol consumption were independent of plasma HDL levels.
Results from this study add to the evidence
supporting a protective effect of moderate alcohol intake on ischemic
strokes. Up to 2 alcoholic drinks per day were associated with
decreasing the risk of strokes, and heavy drinking was shown to
increase risk. However, ex-heavy drinkers were able to reduce their
risk by reducing their alcohol intake to 2 drinks per day.
Sacco RL, Elkind M, Boden-Albala B, et al.
The protective effect of moderate alcohol consumption on ischemic
stroke. JAMA. 1999;281:53-60.
Table of Contents
An apple-shaped physique in males has been
linked to increased diabetes, hypertension, and elevated plasma
TAG levels. Now, according to the results from Nurses Health
Study and a report by Daniels et al., abdominal adiposity is an
independent contributor to CHD risk in middle-aged women and associated
with risk factors in children. During the 8-year nurses prospective
study (1986 to 1994), 251 nonfatal MI and 69 confirmed CHD deaths
were reported in this cohort of 44,702 women. The analysis of biennial
questionnaires revealed a direct relationship between waist to
hip ratio (WHR) and CHD incidence and waist circumference and CHD,
independent of subjects BMI. The incidence of CHD was twice
as high in the highest WHR and waist circumference tertile compared
to the lowest WHR and waist circumference tertile. Also, regardless
of whether WHR or waist circumference was analyzed in quintiles
or stratified levels, the relative risk for CHD was significantly
higher in women with abdominal obesity. For example, after adjustment
for age and other CHD risks, the relative risk for women with WHR
of 0.88 was 3.25 compared to women with WHR of < 0.72. The relative
risk for waist circumference of >96.5 cm was 3.06 compared to
women with waist circumference of > 71.1 cm. The multivariate
analysis for relative risk for women in the highest quintile of
WHR (0.83 - <1.90) and waist circumference (86.3 - <139.7)
were 2.58 and 2.44, respectively. When subjects BMI were
eliminated from the analysis, the relationship between abdominal
obesity and CHD increased.
The WHR and waist circumference were better
indicators of CHD in women younger than 60 years old compared to
women over 60. Also, the WHR was strongly associated with increased
CHD in women at all weight levels. However, "waist circumference
was strongly associated with high CHD among women with a BMI of
less than 25 kg/m2 but not significantly predictive
for women with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or higher." The
relationship between CHD and abdominal obesity measures were only
significant in women who never received estrogen replacement therapy,
but the number of past and current users in the study were too
small for a definitive answer.
The results from the Nurses Health Study
showed that abdominal obesity is associated with increased CHD
risk in middle-aged women. Women with a waistline greater than
38 inches were 3 times more likely to suffer CHD during the follow-up
period than women with a waistline of less than 28 inches. Women
with WHR of greater than 0.88 were also at 3 times the risk of
CHD of women with WHR of less than 0.72. These findings confirmed
previous data that showed a strong relationship between regional
fat distribution and CHD. Rexrode et al. recommend WHR and waist
circumference measurements as two easy methods for determining
CHD risk.
Daniel et al. investigated the association
between body fat distribution and CVD risk factors in 127 children
between the ages of 9 to 17. In this cross sectional study, researchers
used Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) to directly measure
total and regional fat mass instead of waist to hip circumference
or skin-fold thickness measurements.
According to the univariate correlation coefficients,
plasma TAG and HDL cholesterol levels were related to fat distribution.
The HDL cholesterol was inversely associated with central fat distribution
and total percent body fat. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol
were not significantly associated with any of the measures of body
fat. While systolic blood pressure was correlated with fat distribution,
diastolic blood pressure was related to total body fat. The multiple
regression analysis also showed similar relationships between fat
distribution and CVD risk. High abdominal fat was associated with
higher plasma TAG and lower HDL cholesterol levels and higher systolic
blood pressure and left ventricular mass. Also, fat distribution
was more strongly correlated with CVD than percent body fat which
represent overall body fat.
These two studies indicate that high body
fat, especially its distribution around the abdominal area, is
related to increased CHD risk. Daniel et al. showed negative plasma
lipid and lipoprotein parameters with higher body fat in young
children which can potentially lead to CHD events later in life
if the excess adiposity persists, while the data from Rexrode et
al. actually showed increased CHD events in women with larger waist
circumference and WHR. The evidence from both studies strongly
support weight control in children and weight loss in obese adults
to reduce CHD risk.
Daniels SR, Morrision JA, Sprecher DL, et
al. Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk
factors in children and adolescents. Circulation. 1999;99:541-545.
Rexrode K M, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, et al.
Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA.
1998;280:1843-1848.
Table of Contents
I envision a future when the break at a conference
will be a soft drink (fat-free, cholesterol-free, caffeine-free,
sodium-free, calorie-free) and cookies made with psyllium fiber,
fake fat, artificial sweetener and only a single calorie. Some
will gloat over their good fortune to live in this nutritionally
correct (NC) world. While others wonder what horrible deeds we
committed to exist in this tasteless NC world filled with cookbooks
for coffee tables; kitchen utensils and appliances, which few use;
and wonderfully varied cuisines which no one dares enjoy without
sugar, fat, cholesterol, and flavor extraction.
It seems today as in 1678 that "To safeguard
ones health at the cost of too strict a diet is a tiresome
illness indeed." [François, Duc de La Rochefoucauld,
Sentences et Maximes Morales] We seem headed in two directions
at once: food as medicine and food selection based not on taste
or enjoyment but rather on what weve been told is good for
us; and on the other side we are phobic about what weve been
told we must avoid and only buy products appropriately cleansed.
And as these messages barrage the public,
consumer confusion and cynicism grows while our effectiveness for
real dietary improvements shrivels. The public hears that if you
eat our cereal your blood cholesterol will fall down and down.
But whos going to eat three servings every day? And the messages
keep on coming: lower the fat, eggs out of the diet, and lower
calories from fat to loss weight. Is this perhaps what George Bernard
Shaw meant by "Science becomes dangerous only when it imagines
that it has reached its goal." [The Doctors Dilemma
1911].
Todays hot marketing trends are to sell
products as either completely devoid of all those bad things or
as a sure fire way to lower the risk of heart disease, cancer,
obesity or diabetes. Functional food is the new buzzword and soon
everything will be nutritionally improved with "good things" and
sanitized of "bad things."
And so our overweight, sedentary society is
convinced that food either causes or cures illnesses with less
of that non-NC thinking that food can actually be eaten and enjoyed.
There will be no joy at the dinner table then, just eat your medicine
and get on with it. And since youre being so good, for desert
you can have some special cookies!
[In fact, eggs are actually natures
original "functional food" (and for the sake of this
argument, the egg came first). What could be a more functional
food than one whose purpose is to provide all the structural components
and nutritional requirements needed for the development of an embryo.
Now thats functionality! I guess weve all been eating
functional foods for centuries, and enjoying it.]
Donald J. McNamara, Ph.D.
Executive Editor, Nutrition Close-Up
Table of Contents
Executive
Editor: Donald J. McNamara, Ph.D.
Writer/Editor: Linda Min, M.S., R.D.
Nutrition Close-Up is published quarterly
by the Egg Nutrition Center. Nutrition Close-Up presents
up-to-date reviews, summaries and commentaries on the latest research
investigating the role of nutrition in health promotion and disease
prevention, and the contributions of eggs to a nutritious and healthful
diet. Nutrition and health care professionals can receive a FREE
subscription for the newsletter by contacting the ENC.
Back
to Top
|