Good Nutrition is
Ageless
 |
The fastest growing segment of the population in most industrialized
countries is the elderly; and too often this is also a group most
susceptible to many health risks from a nutrient poor diet. Evidence
from numerous sources indicate that a significant number of elderly
fail to get the amounts and types of food necessary to meet essential
energy and nutrient needs. There are a wide range of reasons why
older individuals might not be eating the most nutritious diet
which is all the more reason why health professionals and care
providers need to be constantly aware of the necessity for maintaining
an optimal nutritional health status in the elderly. Physiological,
psychological and economical changes in the later years can all
contribute to poor nutrition among the elderly, and accordingly
establishment of healthy nutritional habits often requires a multifaceted
intervention approach to address the wide range of factors contributing
to suboptimal nutrient intakes.
After age fifty there are many metabolic and physiological changes
which impact on the nutritional needs of an individual. The metabolic
rate slows and can decline as much as thirty percent over a lifetime.
This results in decreased caloric needs which can be complicated
by changes in an older person's ability to balance food intake
and energy needs. Even with a decreased caloric need, many older
people have difficulty getting sufficient calories which can eventually
lead to chronic fatigue, depression, and a weakened immune system.
As we age our body composition changes with a decrease in lean
tissue mass (as much as 25%) and an increase in body fat. Such
changes can be accelerated because older adults utilize dietary
protein less efficiently and may actually need a greater than recommended
amount of high quality protein in their diet to maintain lean tissue
mass. These changes in metabolism and physiology can be exaggerated
due to complications from digestive difficulties, oral and dental
problems, and medication-related eating and nutrient problems.
And while there are many physical and clinical factors that can
contribute to undernutrition in the elderly, there are as many
equally important social and economic factors which can further
complicate the nutritional well-being of an older individual. Contributing
factors include loneliness, lack of cooking skills, depression,
economic concerns, weakness and fatigue, and, in too many cases,
an unwarranted fear of many high quality, nutrient dense, affordable
foods. All these factors can contribute to the fact that a significant
number of older men and women consume less food than required to
meet energy and nutrient requirements, and are at moderate to high
nutritional risk.
The nutritional risk of the elderly is no doubt affected by the
fact that the low-fat, low-cholesterol diet message has been heard
loud and clear by this population. Many elderly readily accept
the fear of fat and cholesterol message because of their heightened
concern regarding their own health, and the knowledge that the
risk for chronic diseases increases with age. And while dietary
limits on fat and cholesterol consumption are widely assumed to
be effective risk-reduction interventions in young and middle-aged
adults, the appropriateness of such dietary restrictions in older
individuals has become an area of considerable debate.
There is evidence that good nutrition promotes vitality and independence
whereas poor nutrition can prolong recovery from illness, increase
the costs and incidence of institutionalization, and lead to a
poorer quality of life. Good nutrition is ageless and the message
to older people must be that the quality of your nutrition is basic
to the quality of your life. And while the evidence of the value
of nutritional balance is clear, the nutritional status of many
older individuals lacks that balance and the problem is often complicated
by a fear of foods and over-emphasis on single nutrient issues.
In this review we will look at the relative benefits of cardiovascular
risk reduction with dietary restrictions versus the potential risks
to the nutritional well-being of the elderly when these interventions
often result in reductions in many nutrient dense foods. The real
question which must be addressed is whether the "one diet
fits all" approach readily fits both the nutritional needs
and health concerns of the elderly.
Dietary restrictions of fat and cholesterol are implemented in
order to lower plasma cholesterol levels and the associated cardiovascular
disease risk. The bases for this dietary intervention approach
to risk reduction are studies in middle aged populations which
indicated that an elevated plasma cholesterol level is an independent
risk factor for heart disease and that reduction of an elevated
cholesterol reduced relative risk. To date, however, there have
been no long-term drug or dietary plasma cholesterol lowering intervention
trials in healthy patients older than 65 years. Some investigators
have presented data indicating that while total cholesterol levels
are an excellent predictor of CHD risk in middle-age, they are
a poor indicator of events in elderly patients [Corti et al. 1995].
Krumholz et al. (1994) followed 997 subjects 65 years and older
for 4 years and was unable to document a graded and continuous
association between plasma cholesterol levels and CHD mortality
or all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. Studies
by Kronmal et al. (1993), using data from the Framingham Heart
Study, indicated that HDL cholesterol levels are a better predictor
of risk in the elderly than LDL cholesterol. Analysis of the data
to determine the relationship between the various causes of mortality
in the different age groups and specific plasma lipoprotein cholesterol
levels indicated that for CHD mortality the positive association
with LDL cholesterol decreased with age. HDL cholesterol was a
strong negative predictor of CHD mortality until past 80 years
of age. For total mortality the relationship with LDL cholesterol
showed a significant age-interaction with relative risk of death
crossing from positive to negative at 62 years of age. In contrast,
HDL cholesterol levels were positively associated with better survival
at all ages. Similar results have been reported by Corti et al.
(1995) showing that the relative risk of death from CHD in persons
71 years and older is 2.5 times higher with an HDL less than 35
mg/dl compared to those with levels greater than 60 mg/dl. The
authors estimated that for each unit increase in the total:HDL
cholesterol ratio there was a 17% increase in the risk of CHD death.
One of the unfortunate consequences of the lower-fat diet message
is that often the replacement for fat calories are calories from
simple carbohydrates which can elevate plasma triglyceride levels
resulting in lower HDL cholesterol concentrations which has been
shown to be an important determinant of CHD risk in the elderly.
An additional effect of a low-fat, high simple carbohydrate diet
is to increase the expression of small, dense LDL particles (Krauss
and Dreon 1995) which are relatively more atherogenic than larger,
more buoyant particles (Gardner et al. 1996). There are also concerns
that low-fat diets may in some individuals exacerbate insulin resistance
leading to hyperinsulinemia which is an independent risk factor
for CHD (Despres et al. 1996). It should also be noted that calorie
dense foods too often are the easiest replacement for the higher
fat, nutrient dense foods. With a diminished sense of caloric balance
the intake of high carbohydrate foods can readily lead to obesity
and its associated risk of CHD (Rimm et al. 1995). Intake of calorie
dense, nutrient poor foods can also lead to decreased intakes of
many important nutrients thought to play important roles in decreasing
CHD risk. These include the fat and water soluble antioxidants
to minimize production of oxidized LDL (Hodis et al. 1995, Kushi
et al. 1996), vitamins B12 and folate to reduce the risks associated
with elevated levels of plasma homocysteine (Boushey et al. 1995,
Herzlich et al. 1996), and other vitamins and minerals thought
to play roles in the regulation of plasma lipoproteins and blood
pressure.
In too many cases it is simply easy for the elderly individual
to reduce consumption of the many valuable nutrients found in abundance
in the food groups they have been advised to restrict or in some
cases actually eliminate. Repatterning dietary choices in an elderly
individual can result in elimination of major food groups from
the diet without any real nutritional benefit, and with some nutritional
risk. It is for reason such as this that it is essential that the
impact of dietary modifications for fat intake on the overall quality
of the diets of elders be carefully evaluated. It has been recommended
that dietary modifications for older adults not be overly restrictive
and that the major emphasis should be on dietary needs to address
immediate problems such as diabetes, food allergies and renal problems.
Nutrition advise for older adults should be designed to respond
to the changing physiological, psychological, social and economic
capabilities of the individual while assuring that the overall
nutritional needs are meet with the freedom to keep meals and eating
an important aspect to the quality of life during the later years.
REFERENCES
Boushey, C.J., Beresford, S.A.A., Omenn, G.S. et al. A quantitative
assessment of plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular
disease: probable benefits of increasing folic acid intakes. JAMA
1995;274:1049-1057.
Corti, M-C, Guralnik, J.M., Bilato, C. Coronary heart disease
risk factors in older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res 1996; 8:75-89.
Depres, J-P., Lamarche, B., Mauriege, P. et al. Hyperinsulinemia
as an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. N Eng
J Med 1996;334:952-957.
Gardner, C.D., Fortman, S.P., Krauss, R.M. Association of small
low-density lipoprotein particles with the incidence of coronary
artery disease in men and women. JAMA 1996;276:875-881.
Hodis, H.N., Mack, W.J., LaBree, L. et al. Serial coronary angiographic
evidence that antioxidant vitamin intake reduces progression of
coronary artery atherosclerosis. JAMA 1995;273:1849-1854.
Krauss, R. M., Dreon, D. M. Low-density-lipoprotein subclasses
and response to a low-fat diet in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:478S-487S.
Kronmal, R.A., Cain, K.C., Ye, Z., Omenn, G.S. Total serum cholesterol
levels and mortality risk as a function of age. A report based
on the Framingham data. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:1065-1073.
Krumholz, H.M., Seeman, T.E., Merrill, S.S. et al. Lack of association
between cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity
and all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. JAMA 1994;272:1335-1340.
Kushi, L.H., Folsom, A.R., Prineas, R.J. et al. Dietary antioxidant
vitamins and death from coronary heart disease in postmenopausal
women. N Eng J Med 1996;334:1156-1162.
Rimm, E.B., Stampfer, M.J., Giovannucci, E. et al. Body size and
fat distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease among
middle-aged and older US men. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:1117-1127.
Back
to Top
|